sivustahuutaja kirjoitti:
Iipoilla on eniten munaa ja ammattitaitoa, sekä riittävä infra glabaaleihinkin operaatioihin. Laivan 'vapauttaminen' ei vaadi armeijaa vaan yhden kommandoryhmän.
...
Iippojen ei tarvitse edes kysyä, ne ovat oppineet haistamaan ruokavalion ja esinahan olemassaolon 10m päähän.
Iippo. Mikä on tuon etymologia, kun nyt vasta törmään ko. sanaan.
Israel on tosiaan aikamoista roistokansaa ja ilman mitään häpyä pistävät vaikka puskutraktorin tai pommien alle niitä, jotka seisovat heidän intressien edessä - oli hihassa YK:n merkit tai ei.
Wikipediassa oli muuten Saksan GSG 9:ltä tuore missio:
"2009: The GSG 9 were on the verge of boarding a German freighter, the Hansa Stavanger, which had been kidnapped by Somali pirates. The case of the Hansa Stavanger, this time off the Somali coast seemed sufficiently symbolic to justify another potentially successful rescue operation, though on a much larger scale. More than 200 GSG 9, equipped with helicopters, speedboats and advanced weapons, had been secretly brought, via Kenya, to a location 80 kilometres (50 mi) from the German freighter. The Americans had lent the Germans one of their ships, the USS Boxer (LHD-4), to use as their flagship in the planned attack—and a fleet of German Navy vessels flanked the enormous helicopter carrier. The ships had been patrolling near the Hansa Stavanger for days, waiting just beyond the horizon to evade detection on the pirates' radar screens. But the commandos were called off before the rescue effort could begin. US National Security Advisor James L. Jones had called the Chancellery to cancel the operation. The US government, worried that the operation could turn into a suicide mission, was sending the USS Boxer back to the Kenyan port of Mombasa, where the German forces were to disembark. Officials at the German Federal Police headquarters in Potsdam, outside Berlin, concerned about the potential for a bloodbath, had also spoken out against the operation.[9]"
http://www.spiegel.de/international/wor ... 52,00.html